From: Doug Maxey <dwm@enoyolf.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@darnok.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
darnok@68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjones@redhat.com,
konradr@redhat.com, konradr@linux.vnet.ibm.com, greg@kroah.com,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, lenb@kernel.org,
mike.anderson@us.ibm.com, dwm@austin.ibm.com,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:02:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9524.1196888576@bebe.enoyolf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071205204046.GA2898@andromeda.dapyr.net>
[added cc: to mikec]
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:40:46 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:26:40PM -0600, Doug Maxey wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:41:21 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > > > Is the current include from open-iscsi being duplicated? If not, why
> > > > not consolidate in one file?
> > >
> > > The include files that come from open-iscsi that are in the kernel do
> > > not have the iBFT data structures in them - therefore no duplication.
> >
> > That is strictly true, at least the "in the kernel" part. There is a
> > file with the definitions, open-iscsi utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.h
> > does have the previous definitons. So what to do? Drop that one? Or
> > keep duplicating?
>
> I would say that utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.h and
> utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.c would be dropped once this kernel
> patch and the patch to open-iscsi to add fwparam_ibft_subsys.c are
> reviewed and hopefully accepted.
>
Ok. If indeed the userspace tool is going completely away, then there
would be just the single instance. Is that the plan?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-05 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 23:34 [REPOST PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4) Konrad Rzeszutek
2007-12-05 0:44 ` darnok
2007-12-05 3:12 ` Doug Maxey
2007-12-05 17:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2007-12-05 20:26 ` Doug Maxey
2007-12-05 20:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2007-12-05 21:02 ` Doug Maxey [this message]
2007-12-05 21:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2007-12-05 19:47 ` [PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4.2) Konrad Rzeszutek
2007-12-21 20:05 ` Greg KH
2007-12-21 21:01 ` [PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4.3) Konrad Rzeszutek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9524.1196888576@bebe.enoyolf.org \
--to=dwm@enoyolf.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=darnok@68k.org \
--cc=dwm@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=konradr@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=konradr@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=mike.anderson@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.