From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:21:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <952fdc14-a8e5-a59a-9c7d-af1adf361d77@oderland.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121102113.41893-2-roger.pau@citrix.com>
On 11/21/22 11:21, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> When running as a Xen dom0 the number of CPUs available to Linux can
> be different from the number of CPUs present on the system, but in
> order to properly fetch processor performance related data _PDC must
> be executed on all the physical CPUs online on the system.
>
> The current checks in processor_physically_present() result in some
> processor objects not getting their _PDC methods evaluated when Linux
> is running as Xen dom0. Fix this by introducing a custom function to
> use when running as Xen dom0 in order to check whether a processor
> object matches a CPU that's online.
>
> Fixes: 5d554a7bb064 ('ACPI: processor: add internal processor_physically_present()')
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> index 16f548a661cf..b9f512138043 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> @@ -61,4 +61,14 @@ void __init xen_pvh_init(struct boot_params *boot_params);
> void __init mem_map_via_hcall(struct boot_params *boot_params_p);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
> +bool __init xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id);
> +#else
> +static inline bool xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id)
> +{
> + BUG();
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_XEN_HYPERVISOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index b8db2148c07d..d4c44361a26c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -346,3 +346,30 @@ void xen_arch_unregister_cpu(int num)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_arch_unregister_cpu);
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
> +bool __init xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, maxid;
> + struct xen_platform_op op = {
> + .cmd = XENPF_get_cpuinfo,
> + .interface_version = XENPF_INTERFACE_VERSION,
> + };
> + int ret = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return false;
> +
> + maxid = op.u.pcpu_info.max_present;
> + for (i = 0; i <= maxid; i++) {
> + op.u.pcpu_info.xen_cpuid = i;
> + ret = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> + if (op.u.pcpu_info.acpi_id == acpi_id)
> + return op.u.pcpu_info.flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_ONLINE;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
My compiler (Default GCC on Fedora 32, compiling for Qubes) complain
loudly that the below was missing.
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_processor_present);
`ERROR: MODPOST xen_processor_present
[drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.ko] undefined!`
Same thing with xen_sanitize_pdc in the next patch.
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_sanitize_pdc);
Everything compiled fine after those changes.
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> index 8c3f82c9fff3..18fb04523f93 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +
> #include "internal.h"
>
> static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
> @@ -47,6 +49,15 @@ static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (xen_initial_domain())
> + /*
> + * When running as a Xen dom0 the number of processors Linux
> + * sees can be different from the real number of processors on
> + * the system, and we still need to execute _PDC for all of
> + * them.
> + */
> + return xen_processor_present(acpi_id);
> +
> type = (acpi_type == ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) ? 1 : 0;
> cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(handle, type, acpi_id);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 10:21 [PATCH 0/3] xen: ACPI processor related fixes Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:02 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:09 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 16:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 17:43 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-30 15:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-30 16:48 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 12:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 16:37 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-09 10:12 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-01-30 9:21 ` Josef Johansson [this message]
2023-02-03 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-03 13:58 ` Josef Johansson
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] acpi/processor: sanitize _PDC buffer bits " Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:13 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-06-14 19:57 ` Jason Andryuk
2023-06-16 14:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/acpi: upload power and performance related data from a PVH dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2023-01-30 9:10 ` Josef Johansson
2023-03-15 11:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16 7:54 ` Josef Johansson
2023-03-16 10:06 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 14:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] xen: ACPI processor related fixes Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 16:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=952fdc14-a8e5-a59a-9c7d-af1adf361d77@oderland.se \
--to=josef@oderland.se \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.