From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Zhenzhong Duan" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: chao.p.peng@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:PowerPC TCG CPUs" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/ppc: Improve build for PPC VFIO
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:45:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95739695-ce1d-458d-802d-91346cf10025@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a95349c-4005-484f-b623-a1898a224896@linaro.org>
On 11/23/23 11:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
>
> On 23/11/23 08:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 11/23/23 07:01, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> VFIO is not a required subsystem for the pseries machine but it's
>>> force enabled currently. When --without-default-devices is used
>>> to drop some default devices including vfio-pci, vfio core code
>>> is still kept which is unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Introduce a stub file to hold stub functions of VFIO EEH hooks,
>>> then vfio core could be compiled out.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>> I will take this patch through the vfio tree if that's OK for you.
>>
>>> ---
>>> Based on vfio-next/vfio-8.2
>>>
>>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> hw/ppc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> hw/ppc/meson.build | 6 +++---
>>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c
>
> We are trying to remove stubs: instead of checking late in the callee,
> we shouldn't let the caller call functions depending on an unavailable
> feature. So I'm a bit reluctant with this patch.
>
> Can we add a simple 'bool pci_vfio_available(void);' helper? Or rework a
> bit. For example looking quickly, we already have:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
> int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
> #else
> static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
> {
> return false;
> }
> #endif
>
> This should be enough to protect the other calls.
The problem is that CONFIG_VFIO_PCI is not a target option and you can't
use the define as we do with CONFIG_LINUX. The define poisoning does its
job there.
>
> Maybe we just need:>
> -- >8 --
> --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> @@ -122,41 +122,20 @@ int spapr_pci_dt_populate(SpaprDrc *drc, SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> void *fdt, int *fdt_start_offset, Error **errp);
>
> /* VFIO EEH hooks */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
> +#if defined(CONFIG_LINUX) && defined(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI)
> bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
> +#else
> +static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
> unsigned int addr, int option);
> int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int *state);
> int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option);
> int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
> void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev);
> -#else
> -static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
> - unsigned int addr, int option)
> -{
> - return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> -}
> -static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
> - int *state)
> -{
> - return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> -}
> -static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option)
> -{
> - return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> -}
> -static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
> -{
> - return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> -}
> -static inline void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
>
> void spapr_phb_dma_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
> ---
>
> and massage a bit the calls not protected by spapr_phb_eeh_available().
How about what's below instead ?
Thanks,
C.
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio.c
@@ -26,10 +26,12 @@
#include "hw/pci/pci_device.h"
#include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include CONFIG_DEVICES /* CONFIG_VFIO_PCI */
/*
* Interfaces for IBM EEH (Enhanced Error Handling)
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_PCI
static bool vfio_eeh_container_ok(VFIOContainer *container)
{
/*
@@ -314,3 +316,37 @@ int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
return RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
}
+
+#else
+
+bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
+{
+}
+
+int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
+ unsigned int addr, int option)
+{
+ return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+
+int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int *state)
+{
+ return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+
+int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option)
+{
+ return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+
+int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
+{
+ return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_VFIO_PCI */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 6:01 [PATCH] hw/ppc: Improve build for PPC VFIO Zhenzhong Duan
2023-11-23 7:33 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-11-23 7:48 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-11-23 10:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-11-23 13:45 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2023-11-24 7:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-11-24 8:01 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-11-24 6:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95739695-ce1d-458d-802d-91346cf10025@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.