On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:19:29 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov said: > I'd disagree in this case. Anybody will hardly grep for "mask: > %s%s%s%s%s%sflags: %s%s%s%s%s%s". However, egrep 'mask: .*flags: ' is quite plausible. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: not available URL: