From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Yin Xiujiang <yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn>, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Fix out of bounds array access when id < 0
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:06:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96165b43-4be2-644c-dfc9-42173fcfc775@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211221092830.680839-1-yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn>
On 12/21/21 4:28 AM, Yin Xiujiang wrote:
> In of_unittest_untrack_overlay if id is less than 0 then
> overlay_id_bits will be out of bounds. And it is also mentioned
> in bugzilla as a bug report:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214867
>
> Fix this bug by tiggering WARN_ON()
This patch is just papering over the underlying problems.
The tracking of overlay ids in unittest.c depends on some
expectations of the expected range of values of id to be
tracked. The resulting implementation is a bit fragile.
Let me take a look at whether I can create an alternate
implementation of id tracking.
-Frank
>
> Reported-by: Erhard F. <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yin Xiujiang <yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> index 5b85a2a3792a..094f9f4444d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> @@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ static int overlay_first_id = -1;
>
> static long of_unittest_overlay_tracked(int id)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS))
> + if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS || id < 0))
> return 0;
> return overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] & BIT_MASK(id);
> }
> @@ -1918,7 +1918,7 @@ static void of_unittest_track_overlay(int id)
> overlay_first_id = id;
> id -= overlay_first_id;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS))
> + if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS || id < 0))
> return;
> overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] |= BIT_MASK(id);
> }
> @@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ static void of_unittest_untrack_overlay(int id)
> if (overlay_first_id < 0)
> return;
> id -= overlay_first_id;
> - if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS))
> + if (WARN_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS || id < 0))
> return;
> overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] &= ~BIT_MASK(id);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-22 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211221092830.680839-1-yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn>
2021-12-21 11:20 ` [PATCH] of: unittest: Fix out of bounds array access when id < 0 Rob Herring
2021-12-22 18:06 ` Frank Rowand
2021-12-22 18:06 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2021-12-24 16:18 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96165b43-4be2-644c-dfc9-42173fcfc775@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.