All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@knobisoft.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
	tigran aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:34:32 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96590.701.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428182837.62c51f26.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


----- Original Message ----

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> To: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@knobisoft.de>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; efault@gmx.de; tigran aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:28:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
> 
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Martin Knoblauch 
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> >  OK, I just found the reason for both intel-ucode and tg3 failures. Apparently 
> between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 the mount of sysfs has subtely changed from:
> > 
> > /sys /sys sysfs rw 0 0
> > 
> > to:
> > 
> > none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
> 
> I assume that you're referring to the contents of /proc/mounts?
> 
> >  The "none" breaks the RHEL-4 provided hotplug script "firmware.agent" when it 
> tries to parse the mount point for "/sys". As a result, the firmware loading is 
> never properly finished and the driver(s) just timeout on the value  in 
> /sys/class/firmware/timeout. Bingo. Simple fix in user-pace possible - cool down 
> Martin :-)
> > 
> > Questions remains: was this intentional? It breaks existing userspace and 
> should therefore be considered a regression - right? On the other hand, it will 
> never be a problem for RHEL-4/5 kernels, unless the change in 2.6.29 gets 
> backported. Any ideas?
> 
> afaik that was unintentional and was probably a mistake.
> 
> I wonder how we did that.

 Actually, what breaks the RHEL-4.3 script is not the "none", but the duplicate lines in /proc/mounts that I reported earlier in the "regression" thread.

[root@lpsdm52]# grep sysfs /proc/mounts
none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
/sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0

 One of them likely comes from the respective line in /etc/fstab, but where does the second one come from?


Cheers
Martin


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24 12:45 Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29  1:28 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29  3:51   ` Mike Galbraith
2009-04-29  8:17     ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29  9:36       ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29  9:45       ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 12:08       ` Al Viro
2009-04-29 14:18         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-04-29 14:34           ` Al Viro
2009-04-29 17:28             ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 19:11             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-05-05 22:49           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-06  4:45             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-05-06  7:55               ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-06  8:37                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-05-06 10:57                   ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-20 10:22                   ` Analyzed/Solved/Bisected: " Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-27  6:31                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  9:14                       ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-27 11:21                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-27 11:53                         ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-27 18:07                           ` jim owens
2009-05-27 18:18                             ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-05-27 20:12                               ` jim owens
2009-05-27 21:18                                 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-05-28  8:59                               ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-28 19:01                                 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-05-28 20:48                                   ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 17:24         ` Analyzed/Solved: " Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 17:35           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-04-29 17:43             ` Al Viro
2009-04-30 13:02               ` Olivier Galibert
2009-04-29 17:45             ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 17:41           ` Al Viro
2009-04-29 17:51             ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-04-29 18:10               ` Al Viro
2009-04-30  9:12                 ` Martin Knoblauch
2009-05-27  6:22                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29  9:34   ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96590.701.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=knobi@knobisoft.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.