Re: [RFC v3 4/7] platform: x86: Add generic Intel IPC driver

[sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>]

Hi,


On 10/01/2017 07:59 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:37 AM,
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
>> redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
>> duplication between them. This driver addresses this issue by grouping
>> the common IPC functionalities under the same driver.
>> +static const char *ipc_dev_err_string(struct intel_ipc_dev *ipc_dev,
>> +       int error)
>> +{
>> +       switch (error) {
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_NONE:
>> +               return "No error";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_NOT_SUPPORTED:
>> +               return "Command not-supported/Invalid";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_NOT_SERVICED:
>> +               return "Command not-serviced/Invalid param";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_UNABLE_TO_SERVICE:
>> +               return "Unable-to-service/Cmd-timeout";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_INVALID:
>> +               return "Command-invalid/Cmd-locked";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_FAILED:
>> +               return "Command-failed/Invalid-VR-id";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_EMSECURITY:
>> +               return "Invalid Battery/VR-Error";
>> +       case IPC_DEV_ERR_UNSIGNEDKERNEL:
>> +               return "Unsigned kernel";
>> +       default:
>> +               return "Unknown Command";
>> +       };
>> +}
> Since it's continuous list you can define an array of messages like
>
> const char * const *errors = {
>   [..._ERR_...] = "",
>   ...
>
> };
>
> Also you can use enum in the header and define _ERR_MAX there.
> Thus, code would be transformed to
>
> if (error < _ERR_MAX)
>   return errors[error];
>
> return "Unknown Command";
Thanks will fix it in next version.
>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer