All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: offer@sgi.com (richard offer)
To: linux@morgaine.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Good news: no more begging for HW
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:23:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9706170923.ZM15068@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> "Re: Good news: no more begging for HW" (Jun 16, 10:01pm)


* $ from davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu at "16-Jun:10:01pm" | sed "1,$s/^/* /"
*
*
*    From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
*    Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
*
*    I cannot promise anything since there may be some oversubscription
*    to the service :-)
*
*    I think the fairest way would be to publish all these requests on
*    this forum and have the people who care (us) vote on who should get
*    them.  I certainly don't want to be the fascist person who decides
*    who gets what.
*
* Before this gets out of control, I just want to express one sentiment
* of high caution.
*
* Although it may seem desirable to contribute most of the donation
* hardware to kernel level hackers, this can be a mistake in the making.
* At this stage in the game it is just as important to get userland/libc
* developers machines.
*
* Therefore I suggest that at least one person who knows GNU libc,
* binutils, _and_ gcc internals backwards and forwards be on the top of
* the donation list.

We need an X server if we are ever going to get it usable by real users---or is
everyone assuming its for headles machines only. I would put an X server above
most applications in terms of priority (just below native gcc/libc).

Perhaps one ought to go to Xfree86/someone who knows our hardware (not to start
this thread all over again).

This should be very tighly focused, since an X server is a lot of work and we
need a lot of them, one per board (okay in version one we could only support
1280x1024x8, but that seems a waste of all our spiffy hardware).

I used to have a contact in Xfree86, but I haven't heard from him for a while.

If someone takes the server, I'll try and get the clients libraries done
(assuming that I can get remote access to a box).

richard.

____________________________________________________________________

A Guest Signature from Laurent Duperval <Laurent at Grafnetix.com>

  I don't understand why people break up and then get back together.
  It's like going to the fridge, taking a carton of milk that has
  gone bad, then saying: "I'll put it back and see if it's better
  tomorrow."

  parent reply	other threads:[~1997-06-17 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <199706170046.CAA17216@informatik.uni-koblenz.de>
1997-06-17  1:06 ` Good news: no more begging for HW Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  1:06   ` Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  1:53   ` Alex deVries
1997-06-17  2:01   ` David S. Miller
     [not found]     ` <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
1997-06-17 16:23       ` richard offer [this message]
1997-06-17 17:10         ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17 17:49           ` Mike Shaver
1997-06-17 17:49             ` Mike Shaver
1997-06-17 17:53           ` richard offer
1997-06-17 18:00             ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17 18:30               ` Martin Knoblauch
1997-06-17 18:45                 ` David S. Miller
1997-06-18  0:00             ` John Wiederhirn
1997-06-18  0:15               ` richard offer
1997-06-18  0:32                 ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-18  0:32                   ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-19 19:23                   ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18  0:34               ` Getting X on Linux/SGI Ariel Faigon
1997-06-18  0:34                 ` Ariel Faigon
1997-06-18 16:28                 ` Christopher W. Carlson
1997-06-18 19:30                   ` Nigel Gamble
1997-06-18  2:47               ` Good news: no more begging for HW Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-18 12:38               ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18 12:38                 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18  6:37 Larry McVoy
1997-06-18  6:37 ` Larry McVoy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-06-17  6:22 Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  9:46 ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-17  9:46   ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-17 16:08 ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17  2:25 Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  2:25 ` Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  5:31 ` Alex deVries
1997-06-16 23:25 Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  3:59 ` Christopher W. Carlson
1997-06-17  8:15 ` Martin Knoblauch
1997-06-17 16:18   ` Miguel de Icaza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9706170923.ZM15068@sgi.com \
    --to=offer@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux@morgaine.engr.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.