From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 06/12] perf mem: Clean up output format
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:19:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <978f0cb9-43d6-1ae5-e1ce-5ec4cc9fca12@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204232756.GK3613628@krava>
On 12/4/2020 6:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:27:57AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
>> {
>> struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
>> struct addr_location al;
>> - const char *fmt;
>> + const char *fmt, *field_sep;
>>
>> if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
>> fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
>> @@ -186,60 +186,41 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
>> if (al.map != NULL)
>> al.map->dso->hit = 1;
>>
>> - if (mem->phys_addr) {
>> - if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
>> - fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
>> - "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> - } else {
>> - fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
>> - "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
>> - "%s%s:%s\n";
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> - }
>> -
>> - printf(fmt,
>> - sample->pid,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->tid,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->ip,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->addr,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->phys_addr,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->weight,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->data_src,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> - al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>> + field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;
>
> hum, what's the point of having field_sep?
To keep the fmt consistent.
The patch divides the "printf(fmt,..." into two part. In the first half
part, the symbol_conf.field_sep may be modified to " ";
In the second half part, we should not use the modified
symbol_conf.field_sep for the below check. The field_sep keeps the
original value and should be used.
>
>> + if (field_sep) {
>> + fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
>> } else {
>> - if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
>> - fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
>> - "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> - } else {
>> - fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
>> - "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> - }
>> + fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> + }
>> + printf(fmt,
>> + sample->pid,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> + sample->tid,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> + sample->ip,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> + sample->addr,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep);
>>
>> - printf(fmt,
>> - sample->pid,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->tid,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->ip,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->addr,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->weight,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - sample->data_src,
>> - symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> - al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> - al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>> + if (mem->phys_addr) {
>> + printf("0x%016"PRIx64"%s",
>> + sample->phys_addr,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (field_sep)
>> + fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> + else
>> + fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> +
>> + printf(fmt,
>> + sample->weight,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> + sample->data_src,
>> + symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> + al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> + al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>> out_put:
>> addr_location__put(&al);
>> return 0;
>> @@ -287,10 +268,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto out_delete;
>>
>> + printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
>> +
>> if (mem->phys_addr)
>> - printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>> - else
>> - printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>> + printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
>> +
>> + printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>
> if phys addr is the only member, can't we just squeeze it via
> "%s", mem->phys_addr ? "PHYS ADDR" : "",
> like I mentioned in the other reply? and same also above?
>
The phys addr is not the only member, the next patch (07/12) will add
data page size as a new member. So I factor out phys_addr in this and
the previous patch (05/12).
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 17:27 [PATCH V2 00/12] Add the page size in the perf record (user tools) kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 01/12] tools headers UAPI: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h kan.liang
2020-12-07 16:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 02/12] perf record: Support new sample type for data page size kan.liang
2020-12-07 17:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-12-07 20:25 ` Liang, Kan
2020-12-16 15:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 03/12] perf script: Support " kan.liang
2020-12-04 23:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 04/12] perf sort: Add sort option for " kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 05/12] perf mem: Factor out a function to generate sort order kan.liang
2020-12-04 23:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 06/12] perf mem: Clean up output format kan.liang
2020-12-04 23:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-12-07 20:19 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2020-12-08 10:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 07/12] perf mem: Support data page size kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:27 ` [PATCH V2 08/12] perf test: Add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:28 ` [PATCH V2 09/12] perf tools: Add support for PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:28 ` [PATCH V2 10/12] perf script: " kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:28 ` [PATCH V2 11/12] perf report: " kan.liang
2020-11-30 17:28 ` [PATCH V2 12/12] perf test: Add test case " kan.liang
2020-12-08 10:31 ` [PATCH V2 00/12] Add the page size in the perf record (user tools) Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=978f0cb9-43d6-1ae5-e1ce-5ec4cc9fca12@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.