All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: DJBARROW@de.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in /net/core/dev.c
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:34:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9802.992360059@ocs4.ocs-net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:57:56 MST." <15142.11764.844524.381111@pizda.ninka.net>

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:57:56 -0700 (PDT), 
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>You need to find a way to link in the S390 network drivers after the
>net/ module so that the drivers run their init after net_dev_init()
>runs.

Tricky.

net_dev_init() is in net/core/dev.c which is linked into
net/core/core.o which is linked into net/network.o which is linked into
vmlinux as part of $(NETWORKS).

drivers/s390/net creates drivers/s390/net/s390-net.o which is linked
into drivers/s390/io.o which is part of $(CORE_FILES), not $(DRIVERS).

$(NETWORKS) is linked _after_ both $(CORE_FILES) and $(DRIVERS).

Have I mentioned recently how much I hate the "link order depends on
Makefile compile order, except where fudged by special case Makefiles"
method?

David, how do any network drivers that need net_dev_init() work when
all $(DRIVERS) come before $(NETWORKS)?  This is a generic problem, not
s390 specific.

AFAICT net_dev_init() needs to be promoted ahead of $(DRIVERS), either
as minimal code or by moving all of $(NETWORKS).  Then moving
drivers/s390/io.o to $(DRIVERS) instead of $(CORE_FILES) will fix the
problem.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-12 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-12 14:17 bug in /net/core/dev.c DJBARROW
2001-06-12 14:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-12 15:34   ` Keith Owens [this message]
2001-06-12 15:46     ` David S. Miller
2001-06-12 16:11       ` Keith Owens
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-13 10:03 DJBARROW
2001-06-13 10:18 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-12 18:38 DJBARROW
2001-06-12 18:44 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-12 17:05 Ulrich.Weigand
2001-06-12 17:20 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-12 16:43 DJBARROW
2001-06-12 16:51 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-12 17:02 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-11 18:32 DJBARROW
2001-06-12  3:18 ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9802.992360059@ocs4.ocs-net \
    --to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=DJBARROW@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.