From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 17:33:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <985aa113-6d51-1c8d-a688-61ee592bb525@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32d0768e-f7d7-1281-e9ff-e95329db9dc5@linux.alibaba.com>
On 31/05/2020 17:12, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>> A v5 with those two things would be ready to commit.
> First thanks for figuring out this bug.
> Indeed, I had run test cases in liburing/test multiple rounds before sending
> V4 patches, and all test cases pass, no kernel issues occurred, here is my kernel
> build config, seems that I had kasan enabled.
> [lege@localhost linux]$ cat .config | grep KASAN
> CONFIG_KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET=0xdffffc0000000000
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC=y
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_KASAN=y
> CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE=y
> # CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE is not set
> CONFIG_KASAN_STACK=1
> # CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC is not set
> # CONFIG_TEST_KASAN is not set
> But I don't know why I did't reproduce the bug, sorry.
Hmm, can't find an option to poison allocated mem. Try to fill req->work
with garbage by hand (just after allocation), should help to reproduce.
>
> Are you fine below changes?
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 12296ce3e8b9..2a3a02838f7b 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -907,9 +907,10 @@ static void io_file_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
> static inline void io_req_init_async(struct io_kiocb *req,
> void (*func)(struct io_wq_work **))
> {
> - if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED)
> - req->work.func = func;
> - else {
> + if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED) {
> + if (!req->work.func)
->func should be initialised after alloc then, if not already.
> + req->work.func = func;
> + } else {
> req->work = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = func };
> req->flags |= REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED;
> }
> @@ -2920,6 +2921,8 @@ static int __io_splice_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
> return ret;
> req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
>
> + /* Splice will be punted aync, so initialize io_wq_work firstly_*/
> + io_req_init_async(req, io_wq_submit_work);
> if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(sp->file_in)->i_mode))
> req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND;
>
> @@ -3592,6 +3595,9 @@ static int io_statx(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
>
> static int io_close_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> {
> + /* Close may be punted aync, so initialize io_wq_work firstly */
s/aync/async/
> + io_req_init_async(req, io_wq_submit_work);
> +
> /*
> * If we queue this for async, it must not be cancellable. That would
> * leave the 'file' in an undeterminate state.
>
> Regards,
> Xiaoguang Wang
>
>
>>
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 14:39 [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 13:57 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 14:12 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:31 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 16:15 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 10:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-01 11:50 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 4:56 ` [PATCH v5 " Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 4:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-02 1:16 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-03 13:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 20:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 20:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 23:29 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-08 7:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-08 12:14 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-08 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 23:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-31 14:33 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=985aa113-6d51-1c8d-a688-61ee592bb525@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.