From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 19:04:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 19:03:52 -0400 Received: from mail.nffs.com ([166.70.182.132]:25357 "HELO nffs.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 19:03:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer From: Steven Willoughby To: stevew@nffs.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <80BTbI6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <20010511133242.B3224@bacchus.dhis.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 11 May 2001 17:00:34 -0600 Message-Id: <989622044.448.1.camel@STEVE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> > > > I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid > >> receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail clients do it. > >> What's the relevant RFC? > > > >RFC 2822, 2.1.1. > > Thanks. It's not quite a standard yet, but it's true, it does limit > lines to 998 characters. Sort of a strange limit, but there you > are.... > Perhaps it's 998 so that with the \r\n end of line it rounds out to an even 1000. That limit is slightly more sensical. Steven