From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: claus@xn--frber-gra.muc.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_F=E4rber?=)
Subject: Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?
Date: 03 May 2004 16:24:00 +0200
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <98BeNnE3cDD@gmane.3247.org>
References: <4092404B.1080108@namesys.com>
	<fc04e710c2e6cd0a79588567b12858af@bouncing.localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <bounce-debian-legal=debian-legal=m.gmane.org@lists.debian.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <Y8YFYB.A.-cB.gp1lAB@murphy>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> schrieb/wrote:
> Sadly, your "invariant section"-inspired changes to the GPL cause
> other problems, which seem similar to combining an ad-clause licence
> with the GPL.

Rememer that an "ad-clause" usually does not render a work non-free,
just incompatible with the GPL. Depending on the size of the ads, it can
be a practical problem or a usability problem, however.

Claus
-- 
http://www.faerber.muc.de