From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [perf vendor events] e2641db83f: perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98c73f1a-e5e3-4eba-ac52-ccf21e3a063c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zo+SC/OORdGWXQ84@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On 2024-07-11 4:04 a.m., Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Kan,
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:15:05AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024-07-10 12:59 a.m., kernel test robot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail" on:
>>>
>>> commit: e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8 ("perf vendor events: Add/update skylake events/metrics")
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>>>
>>> [test failed on linux-next/master 82d01fe6ee52086035b201cfa1410a3b04384257]
>>>
>>> in testcase: perf-sanity-tests
>>> version:
>>> with following parameters:
>>>
>>> perf_compiler: gcc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> compiler: gcc-13
>>> test machine: 16 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2278G CPU @ 3.40GHz (Coffee Lake) with 32G memory
>>>
>>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>>>
>>>
>>> we also observed two cases which also failed on parent can pass on this commit.
>>> FYI.
>>>
>>>
>>> caccae3ce7b988b6 e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50
>>> ---------------- ---------------------------
>>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
>>> | | |
>>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail
>>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metricgroups_test.pass
>>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metrics_test.pass
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2024-07-09 07:09:53 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 105
>>> 105: perf all metricgroups test : Ok
>>> 2024-07-09 07:10:11 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 106
>>> 106: perf all metrics test : Ok
>>> 2024-07-09 07:10:23 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 107
>>> 107: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok
>>> 2024-07-09 07:10:47 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 108
>>> 108: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
>>
>> Can you please try the -vvv option, which should tell the failed event?
>> perf test -vvv "perf all PMU test"
>
> after add -vvv:
>
> 2024-07-11 07:45:20 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test -v 108
> 108: perf all PMU test:
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 18989
> Testing (null)
The test cases use the "perf list --raw-dump pmu" to get a complete
event list. It seems the perf list command got nothing. That's weird.
The main change of e2641db83f18 is to add the "Counter" field and a few
events. It should not impact the perf list command.
What's the output of "perf list --raw-dump pmu" on your machine?
Thanks,
Kan
> ---- end(-1) ----
> 108: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
>>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240710/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-10 4:59 [linux-next:master] [perf vendor events] e2641db83f: perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail kernel test robot
2024-07-10 13:15 ` Liang, Kan
2024-07-11 8:04 ` Oliver Sang
2024-07-11 13:07 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-07-15 20:05 ` Liang, Kan
2024-07-15 20:11 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-15 21:41 ` Liang, Kan
2024-07-15 21:48 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-16 12:52 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98c73f1a-e5e3-4eba-ac52-ccf21e3a063c@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.