From: Zenghui Yu <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
To: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
jasowangio@gmail.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca
Subject: [virtio_pci?] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:37:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98f2f4f9-a7fe-413e-a366-7bed08290697@linux.dev> (raw)
Hi folks,
I hit the following lockdep splat in an arm64 guest whose PCI devices sit
behind an SMMUv3.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.3.0-rc1+ #84 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u34:0/57 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff800104f83ee8 (&md->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: msi_domain_get_virq+0xf0/0x118
but task is already holding lock:
ffffc00081edd930 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpus_read_lock+0x10/0x1c
which lock already depends on the new lock.
Chain exists of:
&md->mutex --> &group->mutex --> cpu_hotplug_lock
The cycle is built from three dependencies:
* cpu_hotplug_lock -> &md_mutex (which triggers the splat). virtio_net's
init_vqs() calls cpus_read_lock() around virtnet_set_affinity(), which
reaches vp_set_vq_affinity(). That calls pci_irq_vector(), which takes
the per-device MSI mutex (&dev->msi.data->mutex) via
msi_domain_get_virq().
* &md->mutex -> &domain->mutex -> &group->mutex. MSI-X allocation of any
device behind the IOMMU holds the MSI mutex while allocating interrupts
through the IRQ domain hierarchy. The MSI parent domain (GICv2m, or ITS
likewise) calls iommu_dma_prepare_msi() from its .alloc() to map the MSI
doorbell, which takes the IOMMU group mutex.
* &group->mutex -> cpu_hotplug_lock. bus_iommu_probe() calls
iommu_setup_dma_ops() under the group mutex; initializing the IOVA
rcaches registers a cpuhp instance, which takes cpu_hotplug_lock.
The cycle only became complete since commit 288683c92b1a ("iommu: Make
iommu_dma_prepare_msi() into a generic operation"), where
iommu_dma_prepare_msi() switched to use the group mutex.
Caching the IRQ number in virtio_pci_vq_info {} (and making
vp_set_vq_affinity() use the cached value) removes the first dependency.
But I'm not sure if this is an appropriate fix. Please have a look.
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
index b90c174450b2..2f42300a8a84 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
@@ -224,6 +224,16 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
goto out_info;
info->vq = vq;
+
+ /*
+ * Cache the Linux IRQ number so that later users (e.g.
+ * vp_set_vq_affinity() from cpu hotplug locked contexts)
+ * don't have to take the MSI mutex via pci_irq_vector().
+ */
+ info->virq = 0;
+ if (msix_vec != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
+ info->virq = pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, msix_vec);
+
if (callback) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
if (!vp_is_slow_path_vector(msix_vec))
@@ -571,7 +581,7 @@ int vp_set_vq_affinity(struct virtqueue *vq, const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
if (vp_dev->msix_enabled) {
mask = vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[info->msix_vector];
- irq = pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, info->msix_vector);
+ irq = info->virq;
if (!cpu_mask)
irq_update_affinity_hint(irq, NULL);
else {
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
index 8cd01de27baf..18b15a5f84ae 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ struct virtio_pci_vq_info {
/* MSI-X vector (or none) */
unsigned int msix_vector;
+
+ /* Linux IRQ number of msix_vector, or 0 if not mapped */
+ unsigned int virq;
};
struct virtio_pci_admin_vq {
Thanks,
Zenghui
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 12:37 Zenghui Yu [this message]
2026-09-22 12:42 ` [virtio_pci?] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected Zenghui Yu
2026-09-22 12:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98f2f4f9-a7fe-413e-a366-7bed08290697@linux.dev \
--to=zenghui.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.