From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@tanstaafl.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: poll() behaves differently in Linux 2.4.1 vs. Linux 2.2.14 (POLLHUP)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:12:06 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98n94m$5pt$1@forge.intermeta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010314015921.19287.qmail@web11808.mail.yahoo.com>, <15022.53815.129522.746120@pizda.ninka.net>
davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) writes:
>Jeffrey Butler writes:
> > I've noticed that poll() calls on IPv4 sockets do
> > not behave the same under linux 2.4 vs. linux 2.2.14.
> > Linux 2.4 will return POLLHUP for a socket that is not
> > connected (and has never been connected) while Linux
> > 2.2 will not.
> > The following example program demonstrates the
> > problem when it's run under linux 2.4:
>True, this behavior was changed from 2.2.x. We now match the behavior
>of other svr4 systems, in particular Solaris. This new behavior in
>2.4.x will not change.
Hi,
but Jeffrey wrote:
--- cut ---
JB> Other operating systems (not that they are necessarily
JB> correct) also output the same as Linux 2.2.14. I
JB> tried this on FreeBSD 4.4.1, Solaris 5.7 (on a SPARC),
JB> and Windows 2000 with Cygwin 1.1.7.
--- cut ---
This is BSD, SysVR4 and an abomination all behaving like 2.2.x and not
2.4.x (which confuses the heck out of a poll()-using daemon
here... :-) )
I'd prefer not to have too many user space surprises in moving from
2.2 to 2.4.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-14 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-14 1:59 poll() behaves differently in Linux 2.4.1 vs. Linux 2.2.14 (POLLHUP) Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-14 2:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-14 8:12 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen [this message]
2001-03-14 16:28 ` Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-14 19:50 ` kuznet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-15 4:00 Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-15 17:22 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='98n94m$5pt$1@forge.intermeta.de' \
--to=hps@tanstaafl.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.