From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: fix port id storage Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:29:40 +0100 Message-ID: <9933117.qs9VA5frF5@xps> References: <20180109162317.18183-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <2341214.iScQkZ5rM7@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com, Boris Pismenny , Aviad Yehezkel , Radu Nicolau To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/01/2018 11:15, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/17/2018 10:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 17/01/2018 23:09, Thomas Monjalon: > >> 17/01/2018 22:57, Ferruh Yigit: > >>> port_id is now 16bits, update function parameter according. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 4c270218aa26 ("ethdev: support security APIs") > >>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org > >>> Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > >>> Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal > >> > >> Obviously, > >> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > Not so obvious actually. > > It is a good fix, but an API change. > > It is more like API fix. > While whole library is using 16bits for port_id, I think we shouldn't deliver > release with this specific API uses 8bits. > > I am for getting this because what it does is wrong. > > > This function was not declared experimental. > > It must wait 18.05. I really want to keep API stable in 18.02. We have to keep this mistake for one more release.