From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nigel@nrg.org
Subject: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date: 26 Aug 2001 21:57:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy> (raw)
Available at:
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-preempt-kernel-1
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.8-ac12-preempt-kernel-1
for kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.8-ac12, respectively.
This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
kernels. Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.
I am eager to see work done on the patch and to see what its future may
be. If you are in any way interested in application latency or
real-time support, I suggest you check this out. If you are just
curious, its an interesting patch none-the-less.
Some benchmarks:
kernel 2.4.8-ac12 (nonpreempt):
dbench 16:
Throughput 12.9453 MB/sec (NB=16.1816 MB/sec 129.453 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 76.0099 MB/sec (NB=95.0123 MB/sec 760.099 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:35.51 (386.34s user, 23.41s system)
kernel 2.4.8-ac12 with preemptible kernel patch:
dbench 16:
Throughput 13.3579 MB/sec (NB=16.6974 MB/sec 133.579 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 31.4971 MB/sec (NB=39.3714 MB/sec 314.971 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:23.26 (387.10s user, 23.42s system)
The performance increase in kernel compile and dbench 16 is decent, but
the decrease in dbench 1 is odd. I am curious what numbers others find.
My "how does it feel" benchmark is that bandwidth seems similar while
multitasking may be a tad smoother with the patch.
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-27 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-27 1:57 Robert Love [this message]
2001-08-27 3:06 ` Updated Linux kernel preemption patches Daniel Phillips
2001-08-27 3:09 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 7:38 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 13:46 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 15:20 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 19:31 ` J Sloan
2001-08-27 19:44 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:12 ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 21:35 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:18 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:24 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 21:40 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 23:06 ` Andrey Nekrasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigel@nrg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.