From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE23BC433F5 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 06:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5451961207 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 06:40:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5451961207 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5EC6E039; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 06:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B16CF6E039 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 06:40:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10158"; a="231698087" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,210,1631602800"; d="scan'208,217";a="231698087" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2021 23:40:26 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,210,1631602800"; d="scan'208,217";a="532508746" Received: from inechita-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.167]) ([10.249.254.167]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2021 23:40:26 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------IrO6k1Lzk0OHEVoFRNhKuT1U" Message-ID: <99e04830-a92b-11bb-ece9-a5c6065b802b@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:40:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Content-Language: en-US To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ", Lakshminarayana Vudum" References: <20211104215813.738524-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> <163606687271.6351.10288462232537670965@emeril.freedesktop.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= In-Reply-To: <163606687271.6351.10288462232537670965@emeril.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] =?utf-8?b?4pyXIEZpLkNJLkJBVDogZmFpbHVyZSBmb3Igc2Vy?= =?utf-8?q?ies_starting_with_=5B1/2=5D_drm/i915/selftests=3A_Use_clear=5Fa?= =?utf-8?q?nd=5Fwake=5Fup=5Fbit=28=29_for_the_per-engine_reset_bitlocks?= X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------IrO6k1Lzk0OHEVoFRNhKuT1U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/5/21 00:01, Patchwork wrote: > Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details* > *Series:* series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Use > clear_and_wake_up_bit() for the per-engine reset bitlocks > *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96593/ > *State:* failure > *Details:* > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21521/index.html > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10841 -> Patchwork_21521 > > > Summary > > *FAILURE* > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21521 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_21521, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives > in CI. > > External URL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21521/index.html > > > Participating hosts (38 -> 35) > > Additional (2): fi-tgl-1115g4 fi-tgl-u2 > Missing (5): bat-dg1-6 bat-dg1-5 fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-u2 bat-adlp-4 > > > Possible new issues > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_21521: > > > IGT changes > > > Possible regressions > > * igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate: > o fi-bsw-nick: PASS > > -> DMESG-WARN > > Lakshmi, this failure is unrelated. --------------IrO6k1Lzk0OHEVoFRNhKuT1U Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 11/5/21 00:01, Patchwork wrote:
Project List - Patchwork Patch Details
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() for the per-engine reset bitlocks
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96593/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21521/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10841 -> Patchwork_21521

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21521 absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_21521, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21521/index.html

Participating hosts (38 -> 35)

Additional (2): fi-tgl-1115g4 fi-tgl-u2
Missing (5): bat-dg1-6 bat-dg1-5 fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-u2 bat-adlp-4

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_21521:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Lakshmi, this failure is unrelated.

--------------IrO6k1Lzk0OHEVoFRNhKuT1U--