From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "domen@coderock.org" <domen@coderock.org>
Cc: emoenke@gwdg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] cdrom/aztcd: remove sleep_on() usage
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a87484905062016141082daff@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050620215148.561754000@nd47.coderock.org>
On 6/20/05, domen@coderock.org <domen@coderock.org> wrote:
> From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>
>
>
> Directly use wait-queues instead of the deprecated sleep_on().
> This required adding a local waitqueue. Patch is compile-tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
> ---
> aztcd.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: quilt/drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- quilt.orig/drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c
> +++ quilt/drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/major.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
>
> @@ -429,9 +430,12 @@ static void dten_low(void)
> #define STEN_LOW_WAIT statusAzt()
> static void statusAzt(void)
> {
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> AztTimeout = AZT_STATUS_DELAY;
> SET_TIMER(aztStatTimer, HZ / 100);
> - sleep_on(&azt_waitq);
> + prepare_to_wait(&azt_waitq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + schedule();
> + finish_wait(&azt_waitq, &wait);
> if (AztTimeout <= 0)
> printk("aztcd: Error Wait STEN_LOW_WAIT command:%x\n",
> aztCmd);
>
Hmm, now that noone's sleeping on azt_waitq the two
wake_up(&azt_waitq); calls in aztStatTimer() don't seem to make much
sense any more... Can they just go away or? If they can go away then
axt_waitq itself would seem to be a goner as well... It might just
be me missing something, but this patch looks incomplete and not
completely thought through to me.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-20 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-20 21:51 [patch 2/4] cdrom/aztcd: remove sleep_on() usage domen
2005-06-20 23:14 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2005-06-20 23:24 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-06-20 23:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-06-21 9:58 ` Johannes Stezenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a87484905062016141082daff@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=emoenke@gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.