All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kvm-unit-tests: inconsistent test result between run_tests.sh and standalone test
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:11:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bf9defb-1482-8f8a-7e8e-d07ab2f51852@linux.dev> (raw)

Hi,

I find the two test results (pmu and intel_cet) are quite different, but 
other
test results are consistent.

gjiang@x1:~/source/kvm-unit-tests> ./run_tests.sh
...
*PASS pmu (142 tests)*
...
*FAIL intel_cet*
...

1. pmu standalone test
gjiang@x1:~/source/kvm-unit-tests/tests> ./pmu
BUILD_HEAD=73d9d850
timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --no-reboot 
-nodefaults -device pc-testdev -device 
isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -vnc none -serial stdio -device 
pci-testdev -machine accel=kvm -kernel /tmp/tmp.Bai8UEIh2F -smp 1 -cpu 
max # -initrd /tmp/tmp.DFE9VFPOdp
enabling apic
smp: waiting for 0 APs
paging enabled
cr0 = 80010011
cr3 = 1007000
cr4 = 20
PMU version:         2
GP counters:         4
GP counter width:    48
Mask length:         7
Fixed counters:      3
Fixed counter width: 48
PASS: core cycles-0
...
FAIL: llc misses-0
FAIL: llc misses-1
FAIL: llc misses-2
FAIL: llc misses-3
...
SUMMARY: 142 tests, 4 unexpected failures
*FAIL pmu (142 tests, 4 unexpected failures)

*And

gjiang@x1:~/source/kvm-unit-tests> ./x86-run ./x86/pmu.flat
/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --no-reboot -nodefaults -device pc-testdev 
-device isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -vnc none -serial stdio 
-device pci-testdev -machine accel=kvm -kernel ./x86/pmu.flat # -initrd 
/tmp/tmp.jiEHps3KLW
enabling apic
smp: waiting for 0 APs
paging enabled
cr0 = 80010011
cr3 = 1007000
cr4 = 20
*SKIP: No pmu is detected!**
**SUMMARY: 1 tests, 1 skipped*

**
2. intel_cet
gjiang@x1:~/source/kvm-unit-tests/tests> ./intel_cet
BUILD_HEAD=73d9d850
*skip intel_cet (test kernel not present)*

Then I am not sure which test result should be correct, standalone test
or run all tests. Or am I missed something fundamentally?

Thanks for your reply in advance.

Guoqing

             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15  8:11 Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-11-15  8:42 ` kvm-unit-tests: inconsistent test result between run_tests.sh and standalone test Andrew Jones
2022-11-15  8:53   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15 10:29     ` Andrew Jones
2022-11-16  1:36       ` Guoqing Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9bf9defb-1482-8f8a-7e8e-d07ab2f51852@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.