diff for duplicates of <9cb9c2177450b656819fd6ed2abe4c8d@codeaurora.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a18b3b7..97802a1 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On 2016-10-05 10:55, bdegraaf at codeaurora.org wrote: +On 2016-10-05 10:55, bdegraaf@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2016-10-04 15:12, Mark Rutland wrote: >> Hi Brent, >> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ On 2016-10-05 10:55, bdegraaf at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Any one of these is fine; we just need to know in order to be able to >> help effectively, and so far it hasn't been clear. >> ->> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:53:35PM -0400, bdegraaf at codeaurora.org +>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:53:35PM -0400, bdegraaf@codeaurora.org >> wrote: >>> After looking at this, the problem is not with the lockref code per >>> se: it is a problem with arch_spin_value_unlocked(). In the diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 1d6e800..d44d89c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -7,13 +7,22 @@ "ref\0884bd5d3a9a1bcf2a276130ffc17412a@codeaurora.org\0" "ref\020161004191159.GA32596@leverpostej\0" "ref\054b18de220f61747bf1c3cdf2a1b9447@codeaurora.org\0" - "From\0bdegraaf@codeaurora.org (bdegraaf at codeaurora.org)\0" - "Subject\0[RFC] arm64: Enforce observed order for spinlock and data\0" + "From\0bdegraaf@codeaurora.org\0" + "Subject\0Re: [RFC] arm64: Enforce observed order for spinlock and data\0" "Date\0Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:11:43 -0400\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>\0" + "Cc\0Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>" + Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> + Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@mentor.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On 2016-10-05 10:55, bdegraaf at codeaurora.org wrote:\n" + "On 2016-10-05 10:55, bdegraaf@codeaurora.org wrote:\n" "> On 2016-10-04 15:12, Mark Rutland wrote:\n" ">> Hi Brent,\n" ">> \n" @@ -27,7 +36,7 @@ ">> Any one of these is fine; we just need to know in order to be able to\n" ">> help effectively, and so far it hasn't been clear.\n" ">> \n" - ">> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:53:35PM -0400, bdegraaf at codeaurora.org \n" + ">> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:53:35PM -0400, bdegraaf@codeaurora.org \n" ">> wrote:\n" ">>> After looking at this, the problem is not with the lockref code per\n" ">>> se: it is a problem with arch_spin_value_unlocked(). In the\n" @@ -122,4 +131,4 @@ "\n" "FYI, this is a \"b\" type fix (correctness fix based on code inspection)." -524016af49703888fd1667dde9f251da39240123c23b09def0f5d14cc218ca16 +68ceb2778e43396d4a1530244b83dd5c7e1b5639e3b4edd319d777506a392f5f
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.