From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 02:23:39 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff05052010231c0b0d29@mail.gmail.com> References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD542CF64@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> <03B0FCC6-50E1-45DF-A24F-B35518AD068D@ira.uka.de> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <03B0FCC6-50E1-45DF-A24F-B35518AD068D@ira.uka.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Joshua LeVasseur Cc: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 5/21/05, Joshua LeVasseur wrote: >=20 > So far, performance seems comparable. >=20 Joshua, as I understand, this project would be a competitor of Xen? is there any published paper about this project? thank you, aq