From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 03:47:12 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff05052011476eac1bb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD542CF64@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> <03B0FCC6-50E1-45DF-A24F-B35518AD068D@ira.uka.de> <9cde8bff05052010231c0b0d29@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Ronald G. Minnich" Cc: Joshua LeVasseur , "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 5/21/05, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sat, 21 May 2005, aq wrote: > > Joshua, as I understand, this project would be a competitor of Xen? > http://l4hq.org/cvsweb/cvsweb/~checkout~/afterburner/afterburn-wedge/doc/= userman.pdf?content-type=3Dapplication/pdf >=20 > for the manual. yes, but that is not a (scientific) paper, which would let us understand more about this technology. one good point about this project is that it modifies the guest kernel very little (according to information found at the homepage, around 80 lines of code) would like to try this new-kid-on-the-block soon :-) regards, aq