From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsupport] Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:33:25 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff050524203311b27d1d@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840836E46C@pdsmsx403> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840836E46C@pdsmsx403> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Ling, Xiaofeng" Cc: Ian Pratt , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 5/25/05, Ling, Xiaofeng wrote: > Is there any comment for this patch? > Is it acceptable or not? yes, i have the same question. sometimes patches sent to the list receive no comment. that means they are in queu for review, and get feedbacks later? or we should re-send the patches to the list (as in LKML) ? i think the policy of accepting patches should be made clear, and put into the FAQ. that would be appreciated by contributors. thank you, aq