From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:53:31 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff050531085334254b42@mail.gmail.com> References: <9cde8bff050530182342a79827@mail.gmail.com> <3d8eece205053106414831da72@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3d8eece205053106414831da72@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk Cc: Xen Dev List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 5/31/05, Christian Limpach wrote: > On 5/31/05, aq wrote: > > This patch (against -unstable ChangeSet@1.1575) does the followings: > > > > - put some configurable variables to xend_config.sxp, and set them to > > default values. That will make people aware of their existence, and > > let them easily reconfigure xend when needed. >=20 > I've not applied this part because we're not sure we're going to keep > some of these. i see the point, but how about part of this patch in -testing tree (see http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg01204.ht= ml). i believe that those options are stable, so if you apply -testing patch (this -testing patch got no comment), we should keep the same options in this patch, and not reject them all. regards, aq