From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: stable / unstable parallel install? Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:20:29 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff050601012035da7156@mail.gmail.com> References: Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Knorr List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 6/1/05, Ian Pratt wrote: >=20 > > > > XCS_EXEC =3D "/usr/sbin/xcs" > > > > > > > > should we execute xcs without the full path? > > > > > > Perhaps best would be to try with no path, and fall back to > > > /usr/sbin/xcs. I'd definitely take a tested patch to that > > effect (for > > > both -testing and -unstable). > > > > Here is the patch: it tries to execute xcs without full path > > first, then if there is error, it fallbacks to the default path. >=20 > xcs should not be on the path. Christian pointed out that such helper > applications should probably live in /usr/libexec/xen >=20 btw, how do you define it "helper application? regards, aq