From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: stable / unstable parallel install? Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:57:51 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff05060407571e8e65f0@mail.gmail.com> References: Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Knorr List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 6/1/05, Ian Pratt wrote: >=20 > > > xcs should not be on the path. Christian pointed out that > > such helper > > > applications should probably live in /usr/libexec/xen > > > > btw, how do you define it "helper application? >=20 > Well, users would not want to invoke it directly. It's not useful to > have on the path. >=20 > I'd much rather continue to have a single script that's run to start all > the necessary components as per a configuration file, rather than > exposing them all individually to users. >=20 > If as Gerd says /usr/libexec/xen is deprecated (though I note that it is > still used by a bunch of stuff in FC3), then what do we go for? > /usr/lib/xen , /usr/share/xen or /usr/opt/xen ? >=20 so no decision has been made on this problem? regards, aq