From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: Parallax or LVM? Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:32:37 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff0506081132342560a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <9cde8bff0506081052e1afcb8@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: andrew.warfield@cl.cam.ac.uk Cc: Xen Dev List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 6/9/05, Andrew Warfield wrote: > Hi aq, >=20 > the parallax code is in unstable and does do cow. It's been > undergoing a bunch of rewrites over the past month and will likely > continue to be unstable for the immediate future. If you want to play > with it, there is a readme in the /tools/blktap directory that should > be fairly accurate, and I'm happy to track down any bugs that you turn > up. That said, if you can wait until the end of the week, I'll be > checking in a few fixes that should make it a bit more pleasant to > work with. ;) >=20 Andrew, blktap looks very interesting. but looks like README is outdated.= =20 i look for the sample code "blkimg" mentioned in README, but dont see it. i guess it has been removed? will play with these code more and get back to you soon ;-) regards, aq