From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: [PATCH] sHype access control architecture for Xen Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:48:33 +0900 Message-ID: <9cde8bff0506210748541bf38b@mail.gmail.com> References: <9cde8bff0506210035158853af@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ray Valdez Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Stefan Berger , Leendert Van Doorn , Reiner Sailer , Tupshin Harper , Reiner Sailer , Ronald Perez , steven.hand@cl.cam.ac.uk, xense-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 6/21/05, Ray Valdez wrote: > On 6/21/05, Tupshin Harper wrote: > > aq wrote: > > > > >any plan to write the tool in other language, not Java? i guess not > > >many people (include me) are willing to install Java on their system. > > > > > >since python is used in xen, i think it is a good candidate. > > > > > >i will play with the code and give some feedbacks. >=20 > > Ensuring that the code compiles cleanly with gcj would eliminate this > issue. >=20 > We will look into compiling the tool with gcj. Thanks. We will appreciate > your feedback. >=20 > > but we still need java to run the binary code, dont we? >=20 > No. The tool is used for generating a binary policy file, which can then = be > loaded into sHype via the > xeno-unstable.bk/tools/policy/policy_tool command. >=20 to tell the truth, installing java into any of my machines is the last thing i want to do. if it is possible to compile java code to native binary, that would be great. then java turns out to be even better than python, right ;-) regards, aq