* RE: July 1 (no bk day) almost here
@ 2005-06-29 21:55 Ian Pratt
2005-06-30 0:41 ` aq
2005-06-30 0:46 ` Rik Van Riel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2005-06-29 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins), xen-devel
> Did I miss a posting on the plans for what the Xen team will
> be doing starting Friday as far as source code management?
> Does the Xen team have licenses for bk?
Until the middle of last week, we were planning on running mirrored
bitkeeper and mercurial trees. However, our current understanding is
that we'd need a BK licence for all the mercurial users who's changesets
we were automatically importing into BK. This clearly isn't going to
scale, so we've had to abandon it.
So, the new plan is a big-bang switch over to mercurial. There's been a
lot of effort invested in this by Michael and James, and it looks like
we'll be good for a public go-live Thursday morning -- I'll send out an
email detailing where the repositories are, and a 'getting started
guide' prepared by Andrew that describes the mercurial equivalents of
simple bk commands. We have a mercurial patchbot that will start sending
out messages to the changelog mailing list as soon as we make the
switchover.
Pretty much all the revision history information in the BK repository
has successfully been imported into mercurial. Various of us have been
playing around with mercurial for a while now, and although it's a step
backwards from bitkeeper, its currently quite usable, and improving
fast. The mercurial developers have been very responsive in fixing minor
bugs and adding features we've requested, so we think this is the best
way forward. Rest assured we've spent a great deal of time investigating
the alternatives...
Stay tuned :-)
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: July 1 (no bk day) almost here
2005-06-29 21:55 July 1 (no bk day) almost here Ian Pratt
@ 2005-06-30 0:41 ` aq
2005-06-30 0:46 ` Rik Van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: aq @ 2005-06-30 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Pratt; +Cc: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins), xen-devel
On 6/30/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Did I miss a posting on the plans for what the Xen team will
> > be doing starting Friday as far as source code management?
> > Does the Xen team have licenses for bk?
>
> Until the middle of last week, we were planning on running mirrored
> bitkeeper and mercurial trees. However, our current understanding is
> that we'd need a BK licence for all the mercurial users who's changesets
> we were automatically importing into BK. This clearly isn't going to
> scale, so we've had to abandon it.
>
> So, the new plan is a big-bang switch over to mercurial. There's been a
> lot of effort invested in this by Michael and James, and it looks like
> we'll be good for a public go-live Thursday morning -- I'll send out an
> email detailing where the repositories are, and a 'getting started
> guide' prepared by Andrew that describes the mercurial equivalents of
> simple bk commands. We have a mercurial patchbot that will start sending
> out messages to the changelog mailing list as soon as we make the
> switchover.
>
> Pretty much all the revision history information in the BK repository
> has successfully been imported into mercurial. Various of us have been
> playing around with mercurial for a while now, and although it's a step
> backwards from bitkeeper, its currently quite usable, and improving
> fast. The mercurial developers have been very responsive in fixing minor
> bugs and adding features we've requested, so we think this is the best
> way forward. Rest assured we've spent a great deal of time investigating
> the alternatives...
what a great news. i cannot wait. isnt Thursday today ? ;-)
regards,
aq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: July 1 (no bk day) almost here
2005-06-29 21:55 July 1 (no bk day) almost here Ian Pratt
2005-06-30 0:41 ` aq
@ 2005-06-30 0:46 ` Rik Van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rik Van Riel @ 2005-06-30 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
> So, the new plan is a big-bang switch over to mercurial. There's been a
> lot of effort invested in this by Michael and James, and it looks like
> we'll be good for a public go-live Thursday morning -- I'll send out an
> email detailing where the repositories are, and a 'getting started
> guide' prepared by Andrew
This is awesome! Thank you.
--
The Theory of Escalating Commitment: "The cost of continuing mistakes is
borne by others, while the cost of admitting mistakes is borne by yourself."
-- Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate in Economics
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* July 1 (no bk day) almost here
@ 2005-06-29 19:42 Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) @ 2005-06-29 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Did I miss a posting on the plans for what the Xen
team will be doing starting Friday as far as source
code management? Does the Xen team have licenses
for bk?
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-30 0:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-29 21:55 July 1 (no bk day) almost here Ian Pratt
2005-06-30 0:41 ` aq
2005-06-30 0:46 ` Rik Van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-29 19:42 Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.