From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: aq <aquynh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xm info
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:42:53 +0900
Message-ID: <9cde8bff0507031742232cfedb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2824BF@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: aq <aquynh@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2824BF@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 7/4/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>=20
> While we're at it, I'd suggest we add an extra level of hierarchy ,
> 'nodes', for NUMA, even if we have nodes hardwired to 1 at present e.g.:
>=20
> > logical_cpus           : 1
> > nodes                  : 1
> > sockets_per_node       : 1
> > cores_per_socket       : 1
> > hyperthreads_per_core  : 1

ok, but from where should we extract the value of "nodes"? should we
extend hypercall or just put it straightly into libxc?

regards,
aq