From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aq Subject: Re: PageReserved ? Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:48:39 -0500 Message-ID: <9cde8bff050717034864cac71a@mail.gmail.com> References: <9cde8bff050715112618053d6e@mail.gmail.com> <9cde8bff050717003018101df2@mail.gmail.com> <68d0dfbc9997f39411120abbbb8f8c41@cl.cam.ac.uk> <9cde8bff05071702403c9aadac@mail.gmail.com> <37caaad80708b68f9d608c83bb9bdbec@cl.cam.ac.uk> <9cde8bff05071702497afeb2fa@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: aq Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 7/17/05, Keir Fraser wrote: >=20 > On 17 Jul 2005, at 10:49, aq wrote: >=20 > >>> With xxx > 32M, domain always failed to boot. > >>> > >>> Any suggestion now? > >> > >> It's probably been broken by the 2.6.12 upgrade. I'll look into it. > > > > No, this is -testing tree (kernel 2.6.11.12) >=20 > I'd add xprintk's to the domU code (or turn printk into xprintk) and do > a debug build of Xen. That'll get some early output from domU. Then you > can work out how far it is getting and ultimately what line of code is > failing. ah, this is interesting. i will give it a try. lets see how to do that: - you suggest adding xprintk to domU code - but exactly which code? - or better redefine printk to xprintk in linux kernel of domU (linux-2.6.x-xenU/) - recompile xenU kernel (no need to recompile Xen and dom0 kernel). is that correct? thanks, aq