Re: Xen 3.0 Status update

[aq <aquynh@gmail.com>]

On 7/28/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > > We need to complete the XenBus/XenStore switchover. Block
> > devices are
> > > basically done
> >
> > Have it checked in yet?
> 
> The code to switch block devices over isn't checked in yet, the rest of
> it is. It's not quite ready for checking in yet, but I think it got
> posted to xen-tools.
> 

unfortunately i havent seen anything posted in that mailing list. the
only message archived of that list so far is a "welcome" mail.


> > > There are a bunch of small outstanding tools issues we need
> > to address:
> > >  * sanitize all the xm commnds to give them consistent naming and
> > > parameters
> > >  * test error paths
> > >  * split console from xend and replace control messages with XenBus
> > > (1st part complete)
> > >  * fix output of 'xm info'
> >
> > oops, i will re-submit the patch to show xen version. but
> > what is wrong with "xm info" at the moment?
> 
> Last time I looked, we weren't exporting all the information available
> e.g. num logical cpus, num nodes, sockets per node. Also we should
> export the Xen architecture as {x86_32, x86_32p, x86_64} rather than
> reporting the dom0 architecture.
> 

ok, i will submit the patch for this problem

> Also, please can you repost you dom0-mem-min and dom0-num-cpus patch to
> the list for general review.
> 

ok.


regards,
aq