From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Avoid possible unnecessary ptrace_may_access() call in kernel_move_pages()
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 02:18:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ce6209f41b64734b2cac748783aa441@huawei.com> (raw)
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:59:33AM -0400, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> There is no need to check if this process has the right to modify the
>> specified process when they are same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>
>NAK, please don't do this -- the ptrace and security hooks already do these kinds of self-introspection checks, and I'd like to keep a central place to perform these kinds of checks.
>
Many thanks for your reply.
We also avoid get_task_struct/ put_task_struct pair of atomic ops, rcu_lock, task_lock and so on this way.
>Is there a specific problem you've encountered that this fixes?
>
I'am sorry but there's no specific problem. I do this mainly to skip the unnecessary ptrace and security hooks.
>--
>Kees Cook
Thanks again.
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 2:18 linmiaohe [this message]
2020-08-20 21:21 ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Avoid possible unnecessary ptrace_may_access() call in kernel_move_pages() Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-18 2:25 linmiaohe
2020-08-17 11:59 Miaohe Lin
2020-08-17 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-19 18:04 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ce6209f41b64734b2cac748783aa441@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.