From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
Cc: Discuss issues related to the xorg tree
<xorg@lists.freedesktop.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xserver development <xorg@freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: State of Linux graphics
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:38:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e473391050831063814cef924@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125468920.84445.21.camel@leguin>
On 8/31/05, Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> wrote:
> the X Render extension." No, EXA is a different acceleration
> architecture making different basic design decisions related to memory
> management and driver API.
I did start the EXA section off with this: "EXA replaces the existing
2D XAA drivers allowing the current server model to work a while
longer."
I'll edit the article to help clarify these points but Daniel has
disabled my login at fd.o so I can't alter the article.
>
> "If the old hardware is missing the hardware needed to accelerate render
> there is nothing EXA can do to help." Better memory management allows
> for better performance with composite due to improved placement of
> pixmaps, which XAA doesn't do. So EXA can help.
>
> "So it ends up that the hardware EXA works on is the same hardware we
> already had existing OpenGL drivers for." No. See, for example, the nv
> or i128 driver ports, both completed in very short timeframes.
>
> "The EXA driver programs the 3D hardware from the 2D XAA driver adding
> yet another conflicting user to the long line of programs all trying to
> use the video hardware at the same time." No, EXA is not an addition to
> XAA, it's a replacement. It's not "yet another conflicting user" on
> your machine (and I have yet to actually see this purported conflict in
> my usage of either acceleration architecture).
>
> "There is also a danger that EXA will keep expanding to expose more of
> the chip's 3D capabilities." If people put effort into this because
> they see value in it, without breaking other people's code, why is this
> a "danger?"
>
> --
> Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu
> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQBDFUr4HUdvYGzw6vcRAl0SAKCVOCHuVweh5CJoz8UzmkTqNxrEuwCfU/t0
> BJVf4HCTUJGn/g4JtsQO0Ds=
> =tWVr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 16:03 State of Linux graphics Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 17:26 ` David Reveman
2005-08-30 18:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 22:38 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-31 6:33 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 8:11 ` Anshuman Gholap
2005-08-31 17:20 ` David Reveman
2005-08-31 17:48 ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:23 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 19:06 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 19:14 ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:29 ` Keith Packard
2005-08-31 20:06 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 20:20 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 1:04 ` James Cloos
2005-08-31 21:06 ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01 1:58 ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01 3:11 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 6:00 ` Antonio Vargas
2005-09-01 10:20 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 13:57 ` Antonio Vargas
2005-09-01 6:11 ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01 3:59 ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01 15:24 ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 15:59 ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 16:39 ` Andreas Hauser
2005-09-01 20:18 ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 20:38 ` Jon Smirl
2005-09-01 21:29 ` Sean
2005-09-01 16:09 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 16:04 ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 17:21 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 17:26 ` Keith Whitwell
2005-09-01 20:03 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 3:11 ` Daniel Stone
2005-08-31 4:29 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 4:50 ` Jon Smirl
[not found] ` <1125464500.8730.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2005-08-31 5:17 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 5:23 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 5:40 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 6:15 ` Eric Anholt
2005-08-31 13:38 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-02 2:44 rep stsb
2005-09-03 4:00 mcartoaje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e473391050831063814cef924@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=eta@lclark.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xorg@freedesktop.org \
--cc=xorg@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.