From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4F6606A31A for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=beta header.b=i8oKXqNe; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=EoHV4qhP; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=foa/KL2M; dkim=neutral header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=DAR3oDje DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Owner; bh=JUh2C9lIgSJgCZuTdt0RFCTJHvgk1WF7QIAw2BHgVqY=; b=i8oKXqNem9lglw q02a19sk8ijbut0695SRtevng29dmAMr9mgzlNPLI8O1CWWzB9FcfZnFnQYEKlSQa15UbXJj2eyyR uQWrUV0I61jdcsK88obH1MbgMJR/Zx7UfGeMCHRr/R1I4jzpcDvR5hD4+XwXg/8OavfqyMzJQ/Kp1 TcI=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xJm1l-000000004CR-0t2a; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:49 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xJm1k-000000004CL-2p0o for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:48 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:References:To:Subject:Cc:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WB+qPHylD4j4YLw3dfH4zxL8YSpeWPdyUE/Y6qCaoeA=; b=EoHV4qhPxD2o9yUJeZvpIMGJ3x 1olJa084Wvzha4hXtSYz2e7bJFpY+Y7SkIzriRxWJlUXDP2/VYlQZVTuROo7nW9WCjU7nhI6sKlMD jYptraDcBtT2rl+3q+yWeGKa11bTPXHLLk+1eJ9mPzDPLJAkHwxwRf91FOzcUAunYD+U=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To: Subject:Cc:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WB+qPHylD4j4YLw3dfH4zxL8YSpeWPdyUE/Y6qCaoeA=; b=foa/KL2M8f3DS987aWzIIFoH+j gACyXiK5u/Hp9Xq3s2wyOZrGrypvnDXI3nJDZ7mz/Lb02LDcE3BYZOSEuiQM85wMNFpKfd+WrfxE7 6LcGttpjWjuE1bBEXbcjCnHSchu2pC9FpKRMxxVbTe3bsi8zSwBseirJznAUg6VZorCM=; Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.100.1) id 1xJm1k-0000000026U-0usP for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCBB60210; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C37ED1F000C1; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:11:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792649502; bh=WB+qPHylD4j4YLw3dfH4zxL8YSpeWPdyUE/Y6qCaoeA=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=DAR3oDjeYYnkl5WzTnZmoojSq+2Q8wphcAsUPt4JIaH0r4Bhkh+P1kYmxSU2nn86i gKcAr9z87V12tj1BxkHqqfvqKPiJOVBJmPWjzMtugUCf7A8VhFRgpJGRTqO4v/ODF5 GOpWlQOeE0zs2dZYjdawQiaETOwEE5oJwRDIvSqWYyxvCidcTgtGuyTLKbL0b/LoID qM0Ts7Xk5tKhJBIWj9LndTNtnEj5LuHb5RDasYmZSwam2avq3hBE/C2EhxUiEsxQKd yPgJKEIRNe/xZbJwP4BGqnTuVTGbbwVfC6F91N7n6TCWm2EWr6olFwSnqnZ0vpEz8g vkwgPy9KudvQg== Message-ID: <9e529489-eff3-44fb-9e70-127971abf671@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:11:38 +0800 X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Nanzhe Zhao , Jaegeuk Kim References: <20261014064445.2835813-1-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com> <63e416aa.2fb2.1a13d9f3491.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> <15373a26.1e3d.1a1494e8d1a.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> <36f5c73d.3a87.1a162171418.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <36f5c73d.3a87.1a162171418.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Headers-End: 1xJm1k-0000000026U-0usP Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 00/16] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Chao Yu Cc: Nanzhe Zhao , Barry Song , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Juan Yescas , Daeho Jeong , Dev Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Pengfei Li , Bo Zhang , Kalesh Singh , Ryan Roberts , Nanzhe Zhao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On 10/22/26 13:30, Nanzhe Zhao wrote: >> >> I'm testing the kernel on my primary phone. After applying the latest ones >> again, I haven't hit the panic yet. So, could you please send v6? Then, I'll >> reapply all and keep testing. >> > > I have just fetched newest dev-test branch and dev branch, I see on dev-test branch > you have already applied my v5 patches, so should I send a complete v6 patches > to a different branch. or I send the changes to patch v5 on dev-test? IMO, rebase v6 on dev should be fine. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel