From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
To: Glenn Judd <gmj@meta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: gro: coalesce padded small IPv4 TCP segments
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:11:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e741e85-76ff-4625-85b0-62ee679aa2b0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731185431.2777685-1-gmj@meta.com>
Glenn Judd wrote:
> Software GRO fails to coalesce small IPv4/TCP segment that was
> padded up to the 60-byte minimum Ethernet frame.
>
> The selftest tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/gro.py subtest
> sw_ipv4_data_lrg_1byte sends {100, 1} expecting to receive {101}.
> In current code, it receives {100, 1} (no coalescing) instead.
>
> Cause: inet_gro_receive() computes its flush term from
> tot_len ^ skb_gro_len() before skb_gro_pull(), while skb_gro_len()
> still includes trailing Ethernet padding. A small IPv4/TCP segment
> padded up to the 60-byte minimum frame has tot_len != skb_gro_len(),
> so flush is set and the runt never coalesces.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6
> Assisted-by: Meta:internal-AI-tooling
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Judd <gmj@meta.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> RFC notes
> ---------
> Per Jakub Kicinski, the open question is fast-path cost: this adds two
> operations to the common IPv4 GRO path for every packet -- reading
> iph->tot_len and the skb_gro_len() comparison. Everything expensive
> (linear check, trim, pointer refresh, csum recompute) is behind unlikely()
> on the slow path. Is that per-packet cost worth the coalescing win for
> padded runts?
>
> Testing: netdevsim cannot reproduce this -- it never pads short frames to
> ETH_ZLEN -- so sw_ipv4_data_lrg_1byte passes trivially there. Reproduced
> and fixed on a real NIC (cx7): baseline FAIL -> patched PASS. Also
> validated locally under KASAN + CONFIG_FAIL_SKB_REALLOC (no UAF).
>
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index 32d006c1a8ee..998ff77fd7b9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ struct sk_buff *inet_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> const struct net_offload *ops;
> struct sk_buff *pp = NULL;
> const struct iphdr *iph;
> + unsigned int tot_len;
> struct sk_buff *p;
> unsigned int hlen;
> unsigned int off;
> @@ -1498,6 +1499,25 @@ struct sk_buff *inet_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> goto out;
>
> NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->proto = proto;
> +
> + tot_len = ntohs(iph->tot_len);
> + if (unlikely(skb_gro_len(skb) > tot_len)) {
> + if (!skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> + if (tot_len < sizeof(*iph) ||
> + pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, off + tot_len))
> + goto out;
> +
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 = skb->data;
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = skb->len;
> + iph = skb_gro_header(skb, hlen, off);
> + if (unlikely(!iph))
> + goto out;
> + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum =
> + skb_checksum(skb, off, tot_len, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> flush = (u16)((ntohl(*(__be32 *)iph) ^ skb_gro_len(skb)) | (ntohl(*(__be32 *)&iph->id) & ~IP_DF));
>
> list_for_each_entry(p, head, list) {
>
> base-commit: 2fbade66245059c78daeaccfce13ecf499fffb51
To address Jakub's question on the fast-path cost: I benchmarked GRO
forwarding with two-minute long iperf sessions using 1, 2 and 4 TCP streams
(17 runs per configuration) and CPU frequency scaling disabled. I also
disabled RSS during the benchmarks because it caused a lot of noise - up to
20% variance in the deltas.
| streams | baseline (Gbit/s) | patched (Gbit/s) | delta |
|---------|--------------------|-------------------|--------|
| 1 | 14.083 ± 1.01 | 14.065 ± 0.67 | −0.13% |
| 2 | 13.891 ± 0.75 | 13.926 ± 0.78 | +0.25% |
| 4 | 13.008 ± 1.26 | 13.029 ± 0.97 | +0.16% |
The two added fast-path operations (iph->tot_len read + the skb_gro_len()
comparison on every IPv4 GRO packet) produce no measurable throughput
change. The deltas are all well under the 95% confidence interval and
indistinguishable from noise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 18:54 [RFC PATCH net-next] net: gro: coalesce padded small IPv4 TCP segments Glenn Judd
2026-08-10 12:11 ` Richard Gobert [this message]
2026-08-13 19:14 ` Glenn Judd
2026-08-13 19:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-08-13 20:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-08-16 1:44 ` Glenn Judd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e741e85-76ff-4625-85b0-62ee679aa2b0@gmail.com \
--to=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gmj@meta.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.