From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68337C10F11 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C820B1F for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727507AbfDVQHx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:07:53 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:55629 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726801AbfDVQHx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:07:53 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2019 09:07:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,382,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="152930294" Received: from jprestwo-test.jf.intel.com ([10.54.74.49]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2019 09:07:52 -0700 Message-ID: <9e8cac221ec049f2359d5fc35de6145a45fbeaaa.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: mac80211_hwsim: EXT_FEATURE_CAN_REPLACE_PTK0 ? From: James Prestwood To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:07:35 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, I know for actual hardware drivers this feature requires more than just the flip of a switch, but is there any technical reason why this is not turned on in mac80211_hwsim? I know it was added relatively recently, so maybe mac80211_hwsim just hasn't turned it on yet? If there are no objections to enabling it, I can send a patch. Thanks, James