All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>
To: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:04:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9eb64399ea51461aef8188ad5cffa9f9@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05bd4fe1-fbf3-4849-96ca-930d04710903@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 2026-07-02 14:56, Brian King wrote:
> On 7/2/26 1:55 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 04:03:48PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
>>> On 7/1/26 4:52 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>> On 6/30/26 12:54 PM, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
>>>>>> IPR dump machinery allocates memory to save adapter's crash dump 
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> __get_free_page().
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This memory can be allocated with kmalloc() as there's nothing 
>>>>>> special
>>>>>> about it to go directly to the page allocator.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> kmalloc() provides a better API that does not require ugly casts 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> kfree() does not need to know the size of the freed object.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Replace use of __get_free_page() with kmalloc().
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Link: 
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/635405e4-9423-4a25-a6e7-e03c8ea0bcbe@redhat.com
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>   drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
>>>>>> index d207e5e81afe..5a212bfdeec2 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
>>>>>> @@ -2893,7 +2893,7 @@ static int ipr_sdt_copy(struct ipr_ioa_cfg 
>>>>>> *ioa_cfg,
>>>>>>   	       (ioa_dump->hdr.len + bytes_copied) < max_dump_size) {
>>>>>>   		if (ioa_dump->page_offset >= PAGE_SIZE ||
>>>>>>   		    ioa_dump->page_offset == 0) {
>>>>>> -			page = (__be32 *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>>>> +			page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>>>>   			if (!page) {
>>>>>>   				ipr_trace;
>>>>>> @@ -3226,7 +3226,7 @@ static void ipr_release_dump(struct kref 
>>>>>> *kref)
>>>>>>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ioa_cfg->host->host_lock, lock_flags);
>>>>>>   	for (i = 0; i < dump->ioa_dump.next_page_index; i++)
>>>>>> -		free_page((unsigned long) dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data[i]);
>>>>>> +		kfree(dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data[i]);
>>>>>>   	vfree(dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data);
>>>>>>   	kfree(dump);
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I _think_ we can replace this with kvmalloc, and allocate the 
>>>>> entire
>>>>> dump buffer in one go. Once switched to kmalloc() it's kinda 
>>>>> pointless
>>>>> to allocate separate page-sized buffers here.
>>>> 
>>>> kmalloc() performance is on par with __get_free_page(), but 
>>>> kvmalloc()
>>>> would be slower if it falls back to vmalloc().
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not familiar with the driver to say if this could be an issue 
>>>> here.
>>> 
>>> This code only runs when the adapter has hit a fatal error, so should 
>>> be
>>> extremely rare. The memory is getting allocated while the storage 
>>> adapter
>>> is in a failed state, so anything running on the system at the time 
>>> could
>>> be stalled until recovery is completed. This memory is allocated and 
>>> should
>>> be freed soon after the adapter recovers. In order for this code to
>>> run, the iprdump daemon must be running, which will then read out the 
>>> dump
>>> after the adapter is recovered, and write it to disk, after which 
>>> time, the
>>> ipr driver will free the kernel memory.
>> 
>> Thanks for the explanation!
>> 
>> So the allocation is not on the hot path and it seems to me that
>> performance differences between kmalloc() and slower vmalloc() won't 
>> move a
>> needle relatively to the entire dump procedure.
>> 
>> And it seems that GFP_ATOMIC here is a historical artifact rather than
>> actual necessity. ipr_get_ioa_dump() runs in a workqueue context 
>> without
>> locks held so nothing warrants GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Agree that GFP_ATOMIC is not needed here, but we probably do need
> GFP_NOIO since we don't want these allocations starting I/O as the
> storage adapter is not in a state where it can handle I/O until
> the card is reset.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian

iprdump works with both of GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOIO.

Tested-by: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 10:54 [PATCH 0/4] scsi: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: target: file: use kmalloc() to allocate temporary protection buffer Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-01  6:58   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: proc: use kmalloc() in proc writers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01  6:58   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-01 10:52   ` John Garry
2026-07-01 13:50     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01  7:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-01  9:52     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-01 21:03       ` Brian King
2026-07-02  6:55         ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 19:56           ` Brian King
2026-07-02 22:04             ` Wen Xiong [this message]
2026-07-03  7:49           ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-03  8:35             ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-07 13:17             ` Brian King
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] scsi: sym53c8xx_2: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01  7:04   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9eb64399ea51461aef8188ad5cffa9f9@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.