From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: "Kernel Insider" (security optimization)
Date: 25 May 2001 04:59:47 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ekos3$v07$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0105250006440.1495-100000@Ono-Sendai.linux.hack>
>Its a linux kernel modification, that allows to decide wich uid, pid or
>file can open a tcp socket in listening state.
- Putting access control on listen() [rather than socket()/bind()]
seems like a really bad idea. In particular, in some cases one can
bind to a port and receive messages on it without ever calling listen(),
if I am not mistaken.
- The use of sock_i_uid(sock) seems poorly chosen; if sock->socket==NULL,
then your module will mistakenly think that the action was requested by
uid 0. In general, the return value from sock_i_uid() cannot be trusted
for permission checks for several reasons. Why don't you simply use
current->euid for your permission checks?
- Checking pid's doesn't seem like a good idea. If a process listed in
allowed_pids dies, then some other malicious process can wrap the pid
space and take over that trusted pid, thereby subverting your access
control policy.
- Are you aware of previous work on this subject? In particular, you
might enjoy checking out the Janus project, which is a much more general
implementation of this idea: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/janus/
- You should really join the mailing list hosted by Crispin Cowan working
to develop kernel hooks for this sort of kernel security modification.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-25 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-25 3:14 PATCH: "Kernel Insider" (security optimization) bruj0
2001-05-25 4:59 ` David Wagner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9ekos3$v07$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu' \
--to=daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.