From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerone Young Subject: Re: Xorg & xen problems Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:10:59 -0500 Message-ID: <9f50a7a0050816171075de926d@mail.gmail.com> References: <1124231829.2741.0.camel@thinkpad> <57df58a16bcebb2fc2d9ed93ae877844@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57df58a16bcebb2fc2d9ed93ae877844@cl.cam.ac.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Ian Pratt , Jerone Young , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org OK it looks like that fixed it....I must have pulled just before that went = in. On 8/16/05, Keir Fraser wrote: >=20 > On 16 Aug 2005, at 23:37, Jerone Young wrote: >=20 > >> It would be great if you could do a 'binary chop' between June 9 and > >> July 12 to try and narrow the changeset down. > >> > > That's what I'm currently upto actually...Just takes forever to > > recompile every time...hopefully I'll find it quickly. >=20 > Changeset 6194 fixes broken /dev/mem, which could affect X servers. If > the repository you were testing with was older than that (it was > checked in about 6 hours ago) then it's worth retrying with latest... >=20 > -- Keir >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >