From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerone Young Subject: Re: [PATCH] supporting non-NX/XD capable processors on x86_64 xenlinux Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:43:32 -0500 Message-ID: <9f50a7a005081717435b03b396@mail.gmail.com> References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304E65827@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304E65827@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Nakajima, Jun" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is identical to the patch Scott Parish sent awhile back. Jun you said that this was not a good way of going about fixing this (actually it was kind of toward another problem ...but I think we were also trying to get x86-64 xen to just boot at the time). I guess this is the best way then? On 8/17/05, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > I remember some people complained that x86_64 xenlinux failed to boot on > the systems with processor(s) that does not NX/XD. The patch should fix > the problem as far as I tested. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima >=20 > Jun > --- > Intel Open Source Technology Center >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 >