Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Followup to:  <15174.20383.84051.790269@pizda.ninka.net>
By author:    "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Rick Hohensee writes:
>  > Forth chips aren't modern in the true-multi-user sense, but if an
>  > individual were to design such a beast they could get several of them,
>  > hundreds maybe, on FPGAs available now. Such things are coming, because a 
>  > Forth chip IS something an individual can design.
> 
> And I suppose this zero-cost call is also handling things like keeping
> an N stage deep pipeline full during this call right?
> 

Believe it or not, that's actually a fairly simple part of the whole
machinery.  All you need for that is to maintain a call/return stack
in the front end of the pipe.  That way, a return that is indeed a
return can be speculated properly; obviously, if the speculation
doesn't work out when you get the return address in the execution
stage you suffer a branch mispredict penalty.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt