From: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:10:46 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9rtnum$pvl$2@ncc1701.cistron.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111011224440.1053-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111020059170.5092-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de> <20011101182334.P16554@lynx.no>
In article <20011101182334.P16554@lynx.no>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com> wrote:
>Probably need to make idle a 64-bit value as well, even if the individual
>items are not, just to avoid potential overflow...
Well idle will still overflow after a bit more than 497 days on a
typical system that is 99% idle, if init_tasks[0]->times.tms_{u,s}time
are left at 32 bits.
Mike.
--
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 22:11 [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime Petr Vandrovec
2001-10-31 21:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 22:58 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 0:23 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 0:52 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 11:21 ` george anzinger
2001-11-01 11:40 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 0:28 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 1:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-02 9:10 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg [this message]
2001-11-02 17:18 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 18:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-02 21:35 ` possibly incorrect comparisons of jiffies in linux kernel Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 16:35 ` [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime vda
2001-11-01 15:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 17:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-01 18:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 18:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-02 14:46 ` vda
2001-11-01 17:29 ` george anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-01 9:02 Petr Vandrovec
[not found] <01103121070200.01262@nemo>
2001-10-31 19:26 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 19:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:00 ` J Sloan
2001-10-31 20:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-31 20:33 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-10-31 20:47 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:11 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 16:09 ` vda
2001-10-31 11:35 Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 15:39 ` vda
2001-10-31 14:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 18:16 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:35 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:58 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 19:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:11 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 20:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:05 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 7:45 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-31 19:06 ` george anzinger
2001-10-31 22:54 ` george anzinger
2001-11-04 18:31 ` Ton Hospel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9rtnum$pvl$2@ncc1701.cistron.net' \
--to=miquels@cistron-office.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.