From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: Prithvi Tambewagh <activprithvi@gmail.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com,
b9788213@gmail.com, straube.linux@gmail.com,
ethantidmore06@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, weibu@redadmin.org,
knavaneeth786@gmail.com, ignacio.pena87@gmail.com,
dharanitharan725@gmail.com, samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com,
karanja99erick@gmail.com, s9430939@naver.com,
suunj1331@gmail.com, ysinghcin@gmail.com
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@gmail.com, khalid@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove duplicate rate checks in PHY_GetTxPowerIndexBase()
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:57:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B3F00249-F9E5-4077-B863-EC809A556296@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405114132.310774-6-activprithvi@gmail.com>
On April 5, 2026 1:41:32 PM GMT+02:00, Prithvi Tambewagh <activprithvi@gmail.com> wrote:
>The code previously checked (Rate >= MGN_MCS0 && Rate <= MGN_MCS7)
>condition twice - once for the (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_20) check and
>once for the (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_40) check. Fix if statement
>formatting to move that if check as an outer if check to improve code
>formatting.
>
>Signed-off-by: Prithvi Tambewagh <activprithvi@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
>index 9e523491a008..efd1c76f2953 100644
>--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
>+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
>@@ -469,11 +469,10 @@ u8 PHY_GetTxPowerIndexBase(
> if ((Rate >= MGN_6M && Rate <= MGN_54M) && !IS_CCK_RATE(Rate))
> txPower += pHalData->OFDM_24G_Diff[RFPath][TX_1S];
>
>- if (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_20) { /* BW20-1S, BW20-2S */
>- if (MGN_MCS0 <= Rate && Rate <= MGN_MCS7)
>+ if (Rate >= MGN_MCS0 && Rate <= MGN_MCS7) {
>+ if (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_20) /* BW20-1S, BW20-2S */
> txPower += pHalData->BW20_24G_Diff[RFPath][TX_1S];
>- } else if (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_40) { /* BW40-1S, BW40-2S */
>- if (MGN_MCS0 <= Rate && Rate <= MGN_MCS7)
>+ else if (BandWidth == CHANNEL_WIDTH_40) /* BW40-1S, BW40-2S */
> txPower += pHalData->BW40_24G_Diff[RFPath][TX_1S];
> }
>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-05 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-05 11:41 [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Code cleanup in drivers/staging/rtl8723bs Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 11:41 ` [RFT PATCH v3 1/5] staging: rtl8723bs: move constant to right side of test in comparison Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 12:49 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 12:51 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-06 20:45 ` Ethan Tidmore
2026-04-07 4:34 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-07 4:37 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 11:41 ` [RFT PATCH v3 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove empty if statement block Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 12:53 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 11:41 ` [RFT PATCH v3 3/5] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify boolean return in IsFrameTypeCtrl() Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 12:54 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 11:41 ` [RFT PATCH v3 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: use read_poll_timeout_atomic in _is_fw_read_cmd_down Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 12:55 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 11:41 ` [RFT PATCH v3 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove duplicate rate checks in PHY_GetTxPowerIndexBase() Prithvi Tambewagh
2026-04-05 12:57 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
2026-04-06 20:47 ` Ethan Tidmore
2026-04-05 13:01 ` [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Code cleanup in drivers/staging/rtl8723bs Luka Gejak
2026-04-08 19:31 ` Prithvi
2026-04-08 19:59 ` Prithvi
2026-04-08 20:19 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-09 13:33 ` Prithvi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B3F00249-F9E5-4077-B863-EC809A556296@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=activprithvi@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=b9788213@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dharanitharan725@gmail.com \
--cc=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ignacio.pena87@gmail.com \
--cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=knavaneeth786@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=s9430939@naver.com \
--cc=samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=suunj1331@gmail.com \
--cc=weibu@redadmin.org \
--cc=ysinghcin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.