From: Shuangpeng <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Fix CEP reference race in siw_accept()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:09:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BBA21909-6E49-442D-8B59-48C7249ED71C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ecec6f-1a88-44a5-a089-951c757f95f3@linux.dev>
Hi Bernard,
Thanks for your reply.
After carefully rechecking the code path, I realized that I had
overlooked synchronization mechanisms: the RDMA core serializes
application QP destruction with iw_cm_accept(), while peer-side teardown
is serialized by siw_cep_set_inuse() and siw_cep_set_free().
Therefore, the concurrent QP-destroy path described in this follow-up
patch is not reachable in the current implementation.
Please disregard my follow-up patch. I apologize for the confusion.
Thanks again for pointing this out.
Best regards,
Shuangpeng
> On Aug 21, 2026, at 11:34, Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 16.08.2026 08:13, Shuangpeng Bai wrote:
>> siw_accept() associates a CEP with the selected QP while holding
>> qp->state_lock. If the transition to RTS fails, the error path releases
>> the lock before detaching that association.
>> The cleanup drops the QP association reference before clearing qp->cep.
>> A concurrent QP destroy can acquire qp->state_lock in between, observe
>> the stale pointer, and drop the same association reference again. This
>> can free the CEP before siw_accept() releases its remaining reference,
>> causing a use-after-free.
>
> Do we have a stack trace for that use-after-free?>
>> Serialize the error-side detachment with qp->state_lock and clear qp->cep
>> before dropping the association reference. This ensures that either the
>> accept cleanup or QP teardown removes the association, but not both.
>> This is a follow-up to commit a93949718259 ("RDMA/siw: Fix
>> use-after-free in siw_accept()") and addresses a separate race in the
>> same error path.
>> Fixes: 6c52fdc244b5 ("rdma/siw: connection management")
>> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260801213632.1086548-1-shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Shuangpeng Bai <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> index 0245b25e7271..da1b953f3fa3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> @@ -1751,11 +1751,13 @@ int siw_accept(struct iw_cm_id *id, struct iw_cm_conn_param *params)
>> cep->state = SIW_EPSTATE_CLOSED;
>> siw_free_cm_id(cep);
>
> What can destroy the QP at this point?
> An appication QP destroy shall be serialized with this
> accept call by the RDMA core.
>
> A concurrent connection drop by peer side would affect
> QP state, but is serialized at the cep using
> siw_cep_set_inuse()/_free() I don't see other cases
> which are not serialized...?
>> + down_write(&qp->state_lock);
>
>> if (qp->cep == cep) {
>> - siw_cep_put(cep);
>> qp->cep = NULL;
>> + siw_cep_put(cep);
>> }
>> cep->qp = NULL;
>> + up_write(&qp->state_lock);
>> siw_qp_put(qp);
>> free_cep:
>> siw_cep_set_free_and_put(cep);
>> base-commit: a9394971825933074032794a5feee5211509c774
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 6:13 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Fix CEP reference race in siw_accept() Shuangpeng Bai
2026-08-21 15:34 ` Bernard Metzler
2026-08-21 16:09 ` Shuangpeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BBA21909-6E49-442D-8B59-48C7249ED71C@gmail.com \
--to=shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bernard.metzler@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.