All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<~sircmpwn/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: log path to loaded firmwares
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 12:55:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY6GDXDCFDBR.1R9QENSVRGR7L@homura> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191103175011.GA751209@kroah.com>

On Sun Nov 3, 2019 at 6:50 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> And it's totally noisy :(
> 
> Please just make this a debug call, that way you can turn it on
> dynamically if you really want to see what firmware is attempting to be
> loaded.

The typical setup won't need more than say, 10-20 firmwares? On my
system I need 13, and 12 of them are just for AMDGPU. In the 20 minutes
since I rebooted to this kernel, it constitutes less than 1% of my dmesg
volume, and will only get less so over time unless I start hotplugging
stuff (in which case, their respective drivers are likely to make noise,
too). In practice, I don't think it'll be especially noisy.

On the other hand, enabling debug logs just to get this information
would generate heaps of noise for a little bit of signal. This use-case
isn't the exceptional case for me, on my systems I only install the
firmwares I need so this is something I would reach for every time I set
up a new system.

> Also, if you have a 'struct device' you should always use the dev_*()
> calls instead, which will show you exactly what device is asking for
> what.

Understood.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-03 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-03 17:38 [PATCH] firmware loader: log path to loaded firmwares Drew DeVault
2019-11-03 17:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-03 17:55   ` Drew DeVault [this message]
2019-11-03 18:04     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-03 18:06       ` Drew DeVault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY6GDXDCFDBR.1R9QENSVRGR7L@homura \
    --to=sir@cmpwn.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=~sircmpwn/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.