From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Date: 24 Jan 2011 08:42:00 +0100
Message-ID: <BeTk1I7T1uB@helmut.hullen.de>
References: <20110123231536.GA2560@scooter>
Reply-To: helmut@hullen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110123231536.GA2560@scooter>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Hallo, Felix,

Du meintest am 24.01.11:

> Sorry that I didn't saw that earlier. If I would use /dev/sdxx
> instead of /dev/disk/by-id/ for decrypting the devices it would be
> working. But those ids didn't change if I remove/add a device, so it
> would be nice to be able to use those ids.

I prefer working with LABELs. They can be short and self explaining.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut