From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: version
Date: 24 Jan 2011 09:33:00 +0100
Message-ID: <BeTk3qCD1uB@helmut.hullen.de>
References: <4D3CEFE3.3090905@csamuel.org>
Reply-To: helmut@hullen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D3CEFE3.3090905@csamuel.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Hallo, Chris,

Du meintest am 24.01.11:

>> Thank you - that's more simple for me than first cloning via
>> "git clone" and then running "git log".

> Ah, but the repo you were asked to clone was for the user tools,
> not for the kernel code that implements the filesystem itself
> which is what that Wiki page is for.

Yes - I've seen that small difference ... but I've installed 2.6.37.

It includes btrfs changes (from the btrfs-unstable branch) until 2010- 
12-14.

My other problem: where has the ENOSPC problem be cured? Is it a kernel  
problem?

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut